[R-sig-phylo] R-sig-phylo Digest, Vol 127, Issue 4

[roee maor]

Hi Andrea,

Last week I posted a question about a very similar model (multi-state
ordered response with a phylogenetic component) on the
R-sig-mixed-models mailing list. Might be helpful to post your
question there as well. Here's the link to the list:
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
I tried to attach the relevant answers here but it doesn't work for
some reason. If you can't find it there let me know and I'll forward
the thread to you off-list.
Best,
Roi

Send R-sig-phylo mailing list submissions to
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
You can reach the person managing the list at
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of R-sig-phylo digest..."
1. 3-category ordinal probit MCMCglmm model (Andrea Soriano)
2. Re: 3-category ordinal probit MCMCglmm model (Theodore Garland)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 15:29:12 +0100
Subject: [R-sig-phylo] 3-category ordinal probit MCMCglmm model
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Dear all,
I am performing a phylogenetic 3-category ordinal probit MCMCglmm model, 0
(non-migratory), 1 (partial migrants), 2 (full migrants). I was wondering
whether you could advise me on which sort of posthoc analysis could I do to
see whether there are differences between each one of the groups (0 vs 1, 0
vs 2, 1 vs 2). Thanks a lot for your help.
Kind regards,
Andrea
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 09:26:41 -0700
Subject: Re: [R-sig-phylo] 3-category ordinal probit MCMCglmm model
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Have you thought about also trying models that just treat this as a
quantitative trait (for which you have crude data), under the presumption
that evolution occurs along the scale of 0 -> 1 > 2 or backwards?
Cheers,
Ted
Theodore Garland, Jr., Distinguished Professor
Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology (EEOB)
University of California, Riverside
Riverside, CA 92521
Office Phone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone] (not confidential)
http://www.biology.ucr.edu/people/faculty/Garland.html
http://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=iSSbrhwAAAAJ
Director, UCR Institute for the Development of
<http://idea.ucr.edu/>Educational
Applications <http://idea.ucr.edu/>
Editor in Chief, *Physiological and Biochemical Zoology
<http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/journals/journal/pbz.html>*
Fail Lab: Episode One

http://youtu.be/c0msBWyTzU0

Dear all,
I am performing a phylogenetic 3-category ordinal probit MCMCglmm model, 0
(non-migratory), 1 (partial migrants), 2 (full migrants). I was wondering
whether you could advise me on which sort of posthoc analysis could I do to
see whether there are differences between each one of the groups (0 vs 1, 0
vs 2, 1 vs 2). Thanks a lot for your help.
Kind regards,
Andrea
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/r-

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
R-sig-phylo mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
------------------------------
End of R-sig-phylo Digest, Vol 127, Issue 4
*******************************************

_______________________________________________
R-sig-phylo mailing list - R-sig-***@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-***@r-project.org/